On March 22, 2013, First Point announced the positive results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) for the Decar project. A copy of the PEA dated August 16, 2013 was prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) by Tetra Tech on behalf of Cliffs and First Point, and filed under First Point’s profile on the SEDAR website as an amended and restated technical report on August 21, 2013. The Decar project PEA assumptions and highlights are as follows:
Decar Project PEA Assumptions and Highlights:
|Pre-tax NPV (8% discount rate)||C$ 1,125 million|
|Post-tax NPV (8% discount rate)||C$ 579 million|
|Cash operating cost||C$ 3.23/lb nickel|
|First Point 1% NSR royalty, Post-tax NPV||C$ 46 million|
|Key Assumptions –|
|Throughput||114,000 tonnes per day|
|Mine life||24 years|
|Life-of-mine strip ratio||0.17:1|
|Life-of-mine average annual nickel in concentrate||82.4 million lbs|
|Concentrate grade *||13.5% Ni|
|Realized nickel price **||US$ 7.04/lb|
|Initial capital expenditure||C$ 1,384 million|
|Sustaining capital expenditure||C$ 763 million|
|Statutory tax rate ***||39%|
|Exchange rate||0.97 US$/C$|
* Concentrate includes by-product iron (45% – 50%) and chromium (~2.0%)
** Based on early-stage marketing studies, the PEA assumes that a nickel-iron-chromite concentrate grading 13.5% nickel will realize 75% of the three-year trailing average LME nickel price of US$9.39 per pound. The PEA assumes no by-product credits are realized for iron or chromium.
*** Includes Federal income tax at 15%, Provincial income tax at 11%, and the British Columbia Mineral Tax at 13% (applied to adjusted net revenue).
The results of the PEA demonstrate the positive potential for establishing a greenfield open-pit nickel mine and an on-site magnetic separation and gravity concentration processing plant, using conventional technology and equipment. At a projected throughput rate of 114,000 tonnes per day (or 40 million tonnes per year) over a mine life of 24 years, annual production averages 37,369 tonnes nickel, or 82.4 million pounds, in concentrate at an operating cash cost of C$3.23 per pound.
The PEA provides a preliminary assessment of the nickel-iron alloy’s economic potential, based on early-stage marketing studies. The PEA assumes that a nickel-iron-chromite concentrate grading 13.5% nickel will realize 75% of the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) nickel price. The study assumes no by-product credits are realized for iron or chromite.
Based on these first-pass assumptions, the Decar Project, on a 100% basis, generates a pre-tax net present value (“NPV”) at an 8% discount rate of C$1,125 million and an internal rate of return (“IRR”) of 15.7%, using an average realized nickel price of US$7.04 per pound. The nickel price is calculated based on realizing 75% of the three-year trailing average nickel price of US$9.39 per pound. On a post-tax basis, the project has a NPV of C$579 million and a 12.8% IRR, assuming aggregate statutory rate for federal, provincial and BC Mineral Tax of 39%.
The initial capital cost is estimated at C$1,384 million, with a payback of 6.4 years. Sustaining capital over the life-of-mine is a further C$763 million.
While the results of the Tetra Tech PEA are promising, the study, by definition, is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There can be no certainty that the PEA will be realized. It is important to note that mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The PEA is based on an optimized pit shell containing 730.3 million tonnes of diluted indicated mineralized material grading 0.119% DTR nickel and 195 million tonnes of diluted inferred mineralized material grading 0.114% DTR nickel, while allowing for 8% mine dilution, 82% milling recovery, 45-degree pit slopes and a life-of-mine stripping ratio of 0.17:1.
The tonnage and grade of material mined and processed that form the basis for Tetra Tech’s economic assessment based on 40 million tonnes per year being mined over the life of mine (“LOM”) are as follows:
Tonnage of Mineralized Material Mined and Processed as a Basis for the PEA
Davis Tube Recoverable Nickel Content
*Note:. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources have a high degree of uncertainty as to their existence, and a great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
The Baptiste deposit remains open along strike in both directions, to the southeast in the higher-grade south-central area and at depth over the entire system providing future potential to significantly increase the size of the resource. Further drilling to determine the extent of the higher-grade mineralization in the southeast area is recommended by Caracle Creek. The limited amount of exploration drilling on the Decar property completed to date also clearly indicates there is substantial potential for additional discoveries.
Financial Assumptions, Results and Sensitivities
The financial analysis for the PEA indicates a pre-tax NPV at an 8% discount rate of C$1,125 million (including NSR royalties), with a 15.7% pre-tax IRR. The post-tax NPV at an 8% discount rate is C$579 million, with an IRR of 12.8% and a payback of 6.4 years. The post-tax analysis assumes a 39% aggregate statutory federal, provincial and BC Mineral Tax rate. The pre-tax and post tax NPV at various discount rates are as follows:
Base Case IRR and NPV at Various Discount Rates
|Discount Rate||Pre-Tax NPV||Pre-Tax IRR||Post-Tax NPV||Post-Tax IRR|
|6%||C$1,715 million||C$981 million|
|10%||C$ 699 million||C$286 million|
Sensitivities were also run around key revenue and cost variables. These are summarized in the table below.
Sensitivity Analysis on Key Parameters at an 8% Discount Rate (C$ millions)
*Sensitivity to nickel price can also be read as a proxy for the revenue impact of equivalent percentage changes in head grade, recovery, and % LME nickel price realized.
Mining and Processing
The PEA is based on a conventional open-pit mining operation using traditional blast, truck and shovel methods, and a processing facility of 114,000 tonnes per day (40 million tonnes per year). Processing of the Baptiste deposit will involve a simple two-stage process to produce a nickel-iron-chromium concentrate. The process will consist of a primary coarse grind to P80 600 microns, followed by rougher magnetic separation, then a regrind to a P80 70 microns size fraction and Knelson gravity concentration to recover a nickel concentrate grading 13.5%.
The process recovery flow sheet and projected nickel recoveries are based on initial laboratory scale metallurgical studies carried out by SGS Canada Inc. and Knelson Research and Technology Centre in 2011 and 2012 on representative mineralized composites from the Baptiste deposit. At the assumed processing rate, the forecast in situ Ni metal in the concentrate is as follows.
|In situ Ni metal in concentrate, LOM||896,865 tonnes (or 1,977,200,000 pounds)|
|Average Annual in situ Ni metal in concentrate||37,369 tonnes (or 82,385,000 pounds)|
|Overall Head Grade, LOM*||0.118%|
|Overall process recovery, LOM||82%|
*Head grade takes into account 8% mining dilution (zero grade material).
The Decar Project is 245 square kilometres in size and covers part of the Mount Sidney Williams ultramafic/ophiolite complex 90 kilometres northwest of Fort St. James in central British Columbia. The project has significant infrastructure advantages. The property is a two-hour drive from Fort St. James on a high-speed logging road (the first 40 minutes of which is a paved road). A branch line of the Canadian National Railway is less than 5 kilometres east from the Baptiste deposit and the BC Hydro power grid is within 110 kilometres to the south of the property.
Infrastructure development is anticipated to include:
- Plant site, haul roads and bridge
- Processing plant
- Mine maintenance garage, warehouse and fuel storage facility
- Administration buildings, accommodation facilities and assay lab
- Fresh water supply and sewage treatment
- Open pit
- Valley-fill tailings dam
- Power supply via an approximately 110-kilometre long transmission line
The results of the PEA show Decar has the potential to be a low-cost producer, with operating costs potentially averaging in the lower half of the industry cost curve. The Project benefits significantly from the low strip ratio, relatively moderate terrain, simple conventional processing and close proximity to major infrastructure. A breakdown on the operating cash costs are as follows:
|General & Administrative||C$0.80 per tonne|
|Mining||C$2.86 per tonne|
|Milling||C$3.25 per tonne|
|Total operating cash costs||C$6.91 per tonne or C$3.23 per lb.|
Capital Costs and Life of Mine Sustaining Costs
Total capital cost estimates are outlined below. The initial capital cost to bring Decar into production is C$1.384 billion, with additional life-of-mine sustaining capital forecast at C$763 million.
|Initial Direct Costs||C$ 970 million|
|Initial Indirect & Owner’s Costs||C$ 197million|
|Initial Contingency (20%)||C$ 217 million|
|Total Initial Capital Costs||C$1,384 million|
|Life-of-Mine Sustaining Capital Costs||C$ 763 million|
The overall capital cost has been compiled with an estimated accuracy level of +/-26%.
Cliffs engaged an independent consulting group to assess the marketability of nickel-iron-chromium concentrate with a grade of 15% total nickel, and a lower grade concentrate of 4% total nickel. The current process flow sheet is expected to produce a 13.5% nickel concentrate, also containing 45% – 50% iron and ~2.0% chromium. Assays performed on the two concentrates confirm that most of the nickel is present as awaruite, a naturally occurring metallic nickel-iron alloy. Magnetite is the dominant mineral present in the concentrate. The major gangue species present is serpentine.
The awaruite-iron-chromite concentrate is unique. There is no direct analogy that can be made between the awaruite concentrate and existing sales of nickel ore or concentrates to downstream smelters or treatment plants. The marketing study showed there are no known impurities that would prove to be fatal flaws and no major technical issues associated with the pyrometallurgical treatment of either concentrate. The following pyrometallurgical processing options were assessed as part of the study:
- Ferronickel smelters – Low and Mid (Iron) Reduction
- Nickel Pig Iron Smelters – Blast Furnace and Electric Arc Furnace – High (Iron) Reduction
- Sulphide Smelters – Roast Reduction Sulphide Smelter and Flash Furnace Sulphide Smelter
The study confirmed a number of potential customers would find the concentrates suitable and, in some cases, desirable. Both concentrates would make a potentially desirable feed to any ferronickel plant, while the higher-grade 15% nickel concentrate would also be a suitable feed for a sulphide smelter, albeit a more desirable feed to Roast Reduction than Flash Furnace due to the overall higher recovery of nickel. The study also found that the lower-grade 4% nickel concentrate is suitable feed for nickel pig iron plants in China, but the estimated realized value in this market is much lower, at 36% of the LME nickel price, than other alternative markets for Decar product.
Based on these findings, the PEA assumes a 13.5% nickel-iron-chromite concentrate will realize 75% of the LME nickel price. The PEA assumes no by-product credits are realized for iron or chromite. In terms of suitability as direct feed to stainless steel production, the marketing study recommends further evaluation is necessary to determine if this is a valid alternative.
Recommendations of the PEA
Following the positive outlook of the PEA, the Tetra Tech report recommends that further drilling should be undertaken to enhance the Project economics:
- Additional infill drilling to increase the confidence of the Inferred resource such that the Inferred resource at the edges of the Whittle optimized pit can be classified as Indicated.
It is also recommended that future metallurgical test work conducted on the Decar Project include:
- Further investigation into the effect of grind size on recovery;
- Determination of the optimum magnetic concentration conditions including magnetic separation intensity;
- Grindability tests with samples selected to determine the variability of the work index of the mineralized material;
- Investigation into variability of the Baptiste deposit block model;
- Environmental and Tailings Management testing; and
- Pilot-scale testing of an optimized beneficiation circuit including magnetic and gravity separation.
In addition, Caracle Creek recommends a separate diamond drilling program of 13 holes totalling 7,800 metres to step-out on the potential higher-grade extension of the Baptiste deposit in the southeastern area.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have no demonstrated economic viability. Mineral resource estimates do not account for minability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These mineral resource estimates include inferred mineral resources that are normally considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these inferred mineral resources will be converted to measured and indicated categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves, once economic considerations are applied. The mineral resource estimates referenced in this news release use the terms “Inferred Mineral Resources.” While these terms are defined in and required by Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), these terms are not recognized by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC”). The SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves” as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. None of First Point’s securities has been registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The above technical information and all the other technical information on this website pertaining to geology and drill hole data was prepared under the supervision of First Point’s Chairman Dr. Peter Bradshaw., P. Eng., a Qualified Person as defined in National Instruments 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.